Talk:International Grape Genome Program

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biological copyedit needed![edit]

I've created this article primarily due to its bearing on viticulture and don't profess to anything more than an basic understanding of applied genomics. It would doubtless benefit from either elaboration, editing or even re-writing in parts, especially as the project is still in its early stages. I would also encourage any citeable dissenting views on the subject of GM grapes. mikaultalk 23:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

"White wine residues have been discovered in ancient Egyptian pottery remains, hence the conclusion that this mutation must have occurred at least three thousand years ago." I suggest this should read something like "Wine residues containing white wine grape genetic material have been discovered in ..." to avoid implying that white wine is necessarily made from white wine grapes, when that is not the case.

Good point, but I'm not sure if that's true; the two sources I've seen quoting the 'Egypt' comment make no reference to any genetic testing and given that it refers to research prior to the grape genome program, I have my doubts. Of course if you can find a source describing the tests carried out on this residue (in a vesel dicovered in Tutankhamun's tomb, apparently) I'd agree it would be a lot less ambiguous. It 's a bit of a wild supposition, is my feeling, more of a nice PR way of saying that all known white grape varieties have a lineage predating the earliest discoveries of wine, but that's the way it was announced. mikaultalk 10:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I also could not find more info on whether it really was white wine based on white grapes. It really puts in doubt the whole conclusion that the mutation occurred three thousand years ago. Maybe it would be better to weaken the "hence the conclusion" to "hence there is a theory" or something else less definite. Randomcomments 20:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're right :) I've qualified the statement. mikaultalk 23:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on International Grape Genome Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]