Talk:Internet Association

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Promotional intro[edit]

Hi Pinkbeast. The previous intro was vague and unorganized- essentially a quote of what it "purports to represent". I generally consider the intro to be a summary of what a company or organization does, plus key info that may be relevant to someone who wants to quickly understand what they are reading about. Do you disagree?80.255.13.14 (talk) 09:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Events[edit]

Pinkbeast, many organizations and businesses have an "events" section. The material was sourced. Do you mind elaborating on the issue/editing the text instead of simply reverting? Thanks83.142.83.25 (talk) 05:20, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The "Virtuous Circle Summit" is self-cited; no independent indication of notability. The cite for the 2014 award doesn't even mention the IA. 2016 is the most incidental of mentions - it's a pretty incidental mention of the person giving the award, and even less significant a mention of the recipient. 2017 - two sentences. You simply don't have significant independent coverage of this stuff, so it stays out. Pinkbeast (talk) 06:02, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks.80.255.7.39 (talk) 06:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Further expansion[edit]

Hello @Pinkbeast:. Given the recent back-and-forth on the page, it seemed I should check in prior to contributing to this article. I'd like to expand on the group's activities- is there some reason I should not? Thanks for your help.156.233.118.227 (talk) 18:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you perhaps have a conflict of interest you should disclose? It seems like there are a lot of anonymous editors all very keen to paint the group in the best possible light. Pinkbeast (talk) 07:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pinkbeast:, no COI. I actually know very little about this topic or this group. I'm on vacation now and won't be online for a while, but may reach out to you later to fix up the article, if that's fine with you.76.76.35.227 (talk) 16:53, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Organizing page[edit]

Forgot to write an edit summary: I divided the subjects into easy-to-see topics to make reading the article and finding information easier for the reader. Any objections, please explain. I personally hate the "Wall of Words" I find in many articles. Thanks. 72.11.28.82 (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]