Talk:Interstate 140 (North Carolina)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough 48 72 03:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
In the infobox, is the future terminus supposed to be at US 17? If so, the future plate is not needed. The route description needs to be written from west to east, not east to west. In addition, it would help to give the length of only the currently completed portion of I-140, not the future sections that have not been built yet. Mileposts should also be included in the exit list. Overall, the article appears disorganized and may need to be rewritten.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Road is still under construction, information will be changing drastically over the next few years.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

A decent article, but at the current time it has several organization issues that prevent it from passing. Therefore, I will have to fail it. The article may be renomianted once it is organized better. Dough 48 72 03:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]