Talk:Interstate 35 in Texas

U.S. Roads: Interstates / Texas Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	Interstate Highways
Locations	Texas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

United States: Texas / Austin Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas - Austin (assessed as Mid-importance).

/Austin ramp configurations

Untitled[edit]

Wow... there is so much construction to change the locations of the slip ramps and strange configurations of said ramps near Austin. --NE2 21:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's for traffic and safety reasons. We've been meaning to do this for quite some time. Rapierman (talk) 03:59, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"IH" instead of just "I"?[edit]

I recently came accross references to "IH-35", instead of the normal "I-35" abbreviation, and I see it's mentioned once in this article. Is this a Texas thing? Is it common? Why do they even do this... what's wrong with plain "I-35"? --Bigpeteb (talk) 15:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's perfectly normal. When the Interstate Highway system was first built, we did use the "IH" abbreviation (for "Interstate Highway"). Over time, the abbreviation morphed into the "I" that we currently use (for "Interstate"). Either way is okay.Rapierman (talk) 04:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 60...?????[edit]

The article says that exit 292B is signed as I-60. There are no plans for an I-60 and no interstate currently numbered 60. Jdcomix (talk) 18:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Interstate 35 in Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040716193603/http://www.i35austin.com:80/brochure/TDOT9004_english.pdf to http://www.i35austin.com/brochure/TDOT9004_english.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]