Talk:Interstate 605 (Washington)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rschen7754 21:18, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Prose review
Lead - Proposals have been around since the 1960
 Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Washington State Department of Transportation has no projects designated I-605, however a project converting Washington State Route 18 to a full limited-access freeway is nearing completion, which is south and east of both I-5 and I-405. - run-on
 Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Proposals - Some of the first plans for a new interstate freeway, bypassing I-405 surfaced in 1968, - the commas make this really hard to read. Try adding one after I-405.
 Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Same sentence - another run-on
 Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Better, but there's still a run-on. -Rschen7754 00:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Now? --Admrboltz (talk) 00:59, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Next sentence - another run-on
 Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't the WA-18 article, I don't see the need for the infobox.
 Done --Admrboltz (talk) 22:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On hold - should be quick fixes, and then a pass. --Rschen7754 22:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passing article. --Rschen7754 01:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]