Talk:Interstate 96/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • The sentence "Two people, Douglas James Baker (age 15) and Jason Eldridge (age 27) were killed in the incident, one of the largest multi-vehicle collisions in U.S. history, which was blamed on heavy fog." needs to be split.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Citations needed for "(As of 2007, I-67 is the largest odd number not in use.)" and "but it would be some time before I-96 was finished into the city."
      • Removed that completely in the first case and repeated a cite in the second. Imzadi 1979  02:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reference 18 is coming up with a 403 error.
      • Only in the automated tool. Try loading it directly, and it works fine. Imzadi 1979  02:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • "The segment from Livonia east is also the Jeffries Freeway, named for a former mayor of Detroit." - You should indicate who the former mayor is.
    • The route description should include more details about interchanges. It seems like some highways the road interchanges with are not mentioned in the route description.
      • That's what we have the exit list for. Most of the interchanges with the major state highways are already directly mentioned in the RD. Imzadi 1979  02:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • I do not see the need for a brief overview of the history at the beginning of the history.
      • I like it so that it isn't L2 header followed immediately by an L3 subheader, and it it's not doing any harm. Imzadi 1979  02:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will put the article on hold for some fixes to be made. Dough4872 02:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will now pass the article. Dough4872 02:52, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]