Talk:Iron Man (Minnesota statue)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

File:Iron Man Chisholm MN.JPG Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Iron Man Chisholm MN.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests - No timestamp given
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 June 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iron Man (statue)Iron Man (Minnesota statue) Iron Man (Minnesota statute)WP:PRECISE this title is not precise enough to identify the topic. There are multiple statues covered on Wikipedia named "Iron Man" (such as Iron Man (Buddhist statue) ), so this title carries ambiguous disambiguation. The current title should point to the disambiguation page (Iron_Man_(disambiguation)), where multiple statues are listed, and the location term be added to the current disambiguation for this page. -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 04:15, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • Support I am the nominator -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 04:06, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Per WP:PRECISE, along with the nom. Conifer (talk) 07:50, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, ambiguous title. Cavarrone 22:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please check the spelling: Is this about a law? —BarrelProof (talk) 05:50, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you, sorry about the typo, it's now been fixed, from "statute" to "statue" -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 02:15, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom -- though, as BarrelProof notes, the new title should use the word "Statue". Omnedon (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Iron Man (Minnesota statue). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]