Talk:Iron nanoparticle

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The introduction doesn't match the title —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.137.243 (talk)

The article doesn't cover the applications, production or very much else about nanoscale iron particles. These are widely used in medical and laboratory applications. The article needs to be expanded or simply replaced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.99.61 (talk)

Yeah, it reads as a self-contained essay on one specific application of the the topic and specifically (and almost only) as a review of the work of one person in that realm rather than an encyclopedia entry on the topic itself. Undue weight/minutiae focus and primarily primary-sourced for the content that is actually on the main topic. I'm almost tempted to brutally stub it down so we can get going on a better article on this important material. DMacks (talk) 00:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the off-topic info/fluff & consolidated the remaining useful info. Feel free to further modify it as you see fit. --ThaddeusB (talk) 03:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]