Talk:Ironsword: Wizards & Warriors II/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 21:58, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late review; I'll get to this in a couple of days. I've just been busy with video games and other stuff lately. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 19:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The prose is fairly well-done. I have a couple of issues; in the gameplay, it sort of implies that from treasure chests, you can find weapon and armour upgrades. Now, do you get both in one chest, or in separate chests? Also, in the third paragraph where it is talking about "golden objects", are the things that follow the mention of these objects the objects in question? - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 20:35, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I made a small addition for the first thing. As far as that other sentence is concerned, it's mentioning all the spells, which the familiar spell does not retrieve. The sentence structure there should be correct as far as I know. –MuZemike 22:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
I'm not sure if I would consider Twin Galaxies a reliable source. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 20:35, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Removed. –MuZemike 22:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
I really enjoyed the whole story about Fabio's use for the game. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 20:35, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Fixes made [1]. –MuZemike 22:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seems good. Nice job. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 03:59, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]