Talk:Isadore Samuel Emanuel

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Australia: Western Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Isadore Samuel Emanuel is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright[edit]

The Wikipedia article was written using the Australian Dictionary of Biography as a reference but none was directly cut and pasted into the Wikipedia text. The part that was cut out was the pound sign in the part about the sale of Victoria River Downs. Hughesdarren (talk) 01:42, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the duplicate report a few phrases have been reworded but the rest are subject specific and unavoidable. Hopefully the article is now good enough to be free of copyright issues. Hughesdarren (talk) 03:49, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]