Talk:Italian art/Archive 1

Archive 1

Untitled

I find that the statements in this article are not supportable. Why not list Italian artists, and paintings or something. Frenchgeek 05:27, Oct 19, 2004 (UTC)

If the statement in the article had any relevance it would be to only one period/one strand of artistic development. Etruscan influences, Papal/secular art and Fascist-era art are among the areas that would have to be covered. Jackiespeel 16:36, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• • I've tried to improve the page by giving structure to it and beginning to write the article. --wayland 19:00, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Well timed! I was just redirecting this page to European Art History as an alternative to deleting it, as the original article was simply rediculous. Luckily I got an edit conflict.

I'd recomend changing the title to Italian Art, though, unless "Art of Italy" follows some art-related Wikipedia naming scheme. :--Asbestos 19:08, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Considering the Music of Italy, Music of Spain, Music of Germany, etc. I think that Art of Italy is probably the better naming convention. Antandrus 02:42, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Sounds good. --Asbestos 01:46, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Okay, I think it's suuficiently removed from the disputed version now that the "disputed" notice could probably be removed but I don't know if I'm allowed to just remove it. Is there a proper protocol for removing the notice does anyone know? --wayland 13:06, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

If there's a raging debate, the protocol is to reach a concesus. As it is, I think it's fine. I'll remove the notice. -- Asbestos 11:40, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Improvement Drive

The article Culture of Italy has been listed to be improved on Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive. You can add your vote there if you would like to support the article.--Fenice 14:21, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Information Lacking

I feel the information on the, "Art of Italy", is lacking in information. It shows information on Rome, Byzantine Pireod, Gothic Period, The Etruscans, and other things. But when it gets to the actual point of the article, "Art of Italy", there is only a little paragraph. This article needs more improvement for information on Italy.-Greg-67.100.39.251 00:28, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

WTF????!??!?!?!?

What the hell does "mainly in ass of the 18th century" in the section on Rococo art mean??????74.140.136.51 (talk) 23:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism edit fixed. --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Italian art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061104164747/http://www.kdfineart-italia.com/ to http://www.kdfineart-italia.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 18 November 2017 (UTC)