Talk:Italian battleship Regina Elena

Italian battleship Regina Elena has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Italian battleship Regina Elena is part of the Battleships of Italy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 27, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
September 11, 2015	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian battleship Regina Elena/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 01:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note I'm a Good Article recruiter and am also using this review as a teaching tool for my recruitee. —Ed!^(talk) 01:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this one. —Ed!^(talk) 01:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In "design," please link to Ship displacement on first use. In "service history," please link "laid down" "launched" and "commissioned" to their respective articles, too.
- All linked.
The displacement in the infobox doesn't match up to what is in the text.
- Should have been LT in the template, not MT.
"Regina Elena had a crew of 742–764 officers and enlisted men." -- Does the difference in crew complement depend on if the ship is at regular load or full load?
- Presumably it's just that the figure changed over the life of the vessel.
"under the command of Vice Admiral di Brocchetti." -- Does he have a first name?
- According to this, it's Alfonso.
"in protest of the Ottoman decision to prohibit Italian post offices in Ottoman territory." -- Is there a wikilink to this event or some more information about it in another article?
- Nothing I've been able to track down, unfortunately.
"under the command of Vice Admiral Aubry" -- Again here a first name would be helpful. Also, it isn't clear, does Aubry command this ship, the squadron, the division, or the three sisters?
- Yup, and he even has a Wiki article (I found it when writing the article on Vittorio Emmanuele and forgot to update this one (and probably the Regina Margheritas need fixing too).
"the Naval Chief of Staff, Admiral Paolo Thaon di Revel, believed the threat from submarines in the confined waters of the Adriatic was too serious to permit an active fleet policy." -- He's the Italian Naval Chief, right?
- Yeah, is there anything there that needs to be clarified?
I spot no duplicate links or disambiguation links. All external links appear to be working. Images all appear to be properly lisenced. I see no problems with article stability and neutrality.

Placing the article on hold pending a few fixes. —Ed!^(talk) 02:31, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article, Ed. Parsecboy (talk) 16:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. Passing for GA now. —Ed!^(talk) 18:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]