Talk:JHOVE

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 October 2005. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Note on deletion debate[edit]

Today I just saw the result of the deletion debate, which I hadn't previously been aware of. Just a couple of clarifying notes: The original entry wasn't created by any of us at OIS, so it wasn't a "vanity" entry in that sense. Eventually I got around to expanding the article, after the discussion (which I didn't know about) had happened. I wrote most of the JHOVE code, so perhaps it's now a vanity article. :) But I hope it's more useful with the expansion. GMcGath 10:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Needs updating[edit]

JHOVE is currently up to v1.9 (Project page). I don't know about the backward compatibility, so I'm going to ask the developer to check and update the page. --Thnidu (talk) 22:05, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't currently do Wikipedia editing beyond fixing an occasional typo, having been burned out by nonexistent dispute resolution, but here are some comments people may want to make use of. (I'm the primary developer of JHOVE.) JHOVE 1.9 is backward compatible in the sense that all changes are designed to improve performance or fix bugs. The most incompatible change I can think of was the replacement of the pre-release MIX schema with the latest one. That happened quite a few versions ago. Some people could be relying on quirks of one version that aren't the same in later ones, though. JHOVE2 exists, and the statement that it's "under development" is outdated. JHOVE2 (http://jhove2.org/) is a completely different application with no compatibility with JHOVE. -- Gary McGath, December 18, 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.181.78.82 (talk) 23:06, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on JHOVE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150710032427/http://www.pdfa.org/2014/12/ensuring-long-term-access-pdf-validation-with-jhove/ to http://www.pdfa.org/2014/12/ensuring-long-term-access-pdf-validation-with-jhove/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]