Talk:Jackpot Junction Casino Hotel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability[edit]

What more needs to be done to meet WP:CORP? It has multiple secondary sources and over 34,000 Google entries. Since casino articles are generally notable this should be sufficient. Vegaswikian 08:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ghits do not necessarily indicate notability, particularly where a subject is susceptible to being listed in directories, like one of the cites in the article. In a perfect world, I'd like the article to have something going for it other than "general notability", so that WP doesn't become an indiscriminate directory of casinos, but I'm ok with this one. --Butseriouslyfolks 18:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merging[edit]

There's no doubt that the two articles should be merged. They include much the same content. Commercial advertising should be eliminated in favor of basic information about facilities. BartBee 13:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea to merge: no point in having both. Nyttend 15:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject[edit]

  • Somebody will have to explain how this rural Minnesota casino can be within the purview of a category about Nevada gambling. It's absurd on its face. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bartbee55057 (talkcontribs) 13:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm doing the assessments and fixing the project tag with a past that includes multiple project tags. Looks like I missed deleting one in this case. The fix was to add the missing one for Minnesota which no one had added. Any one can add the state project boxes to articles clearly of interest to each state. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jackpot Junction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]