Jump to content

Talk:James Johnson (woodcarver)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 25 May 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to James Johnson (woodcarver) (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 15:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


James Johnson (carving artist)James Johnson (carver) – Per requested move at Talk:James Johnson (English artist). * Pppery * it has begun... 15:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • 'Carver' is a weird term, wouldn't 'sculptor' be better—blindlynx 02:05, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He is a woodcarver, specifically and I think it should be either James Johnson (woodcarver) or James Johnson (sculptor).  oncamera  (talk page) 07:17, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fine with either of those —blindlynx 15:28, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As am I. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:41, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought I would prefer (woodcarver) to reduce confusion with James Johnson (engraver) * Pppery * it has begun... 17:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
good point —blindlynx 20:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. That's what he is. "Carver" is certainly not a weird term. I'd support "woodcarver" too. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.