Talk:James Pascoe Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:James Pascoe Group/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CorporateM (talk · contribs) 05:25, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I'll do this review. CorporateM (Talk) 05:25, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to pass the article at this time, but I hope I provided some feedback that may lead to a strong second nomination in the future. CorporateM (Talk) 05:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Lead[edit]

  • The lead should both define the subject and summarize the article, but currently it feels like it only defines it, because there is no corporate history, controversies, etc. For example, most company pages should probably include the foundation date in the Lede.CorporateM (Talk) 05:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Infobox: The Key People section has a name, Anne Norman, with no titleCorporateM (Talk) 05:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Infobox: Do we need that many people listed?CorporateM (Talk) 05:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Infobox: Just checking if you have looked through their website to find an updated/accurate employee count CorporateM (Talk) 05:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

  • "iconic" - promotion CorporateM (Talk) 05:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Most of this section should go under an "Activities" or similar section, rather than history CorporateM (Talk) 05:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • External links are not allowed in the body of the article CorporateM (Talk) 05:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The section sounds promotional, but would be acceptable if it had strong sources. However, when I look at this source for example, it does not appear to support the article text or mention the company at all. CorporateM (Talk) 05:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance[edit]

This article is on "James Pascoe Group" but it includes a lot of off-topic information, such as bios on its executives and dedicated sections about individual companies. Probably a list of companies with a summary would be best. The execs can have their own article if they are notable enough for one.CorporateM (Talk) 05:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Misc[edit]

  • Needs red links and external links taken out throughout. CorporateM (Talk) 05:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Everything in the article should have a source, but just looking at the Farmers section as an example, there are a couple sentences at the end of each paragraph on the bottom half with no citations. CorporateM (Talk) 05:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image gallery[edit]

Pear285, your use of this article for an excessive number of images is inappropriate. As per my 9 July 2016 edit summary, that's what a Commons category is for. Please review WP:IG. Also, please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy and if that could apply to yourself, please disclose that here. Schwede66 05:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on James Pascoe Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Pascoe Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute[edit]

What does it mean by "Goldmark is the only brand operating in both countries"? Jordf32123 (talk) 00:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:James_Pascoe_Group&oldid=1207786051"