Talk:James Scaramanga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Place of birth[edit]

Since more sources (as well as his grave marker) list Redhill as his birthplace, why don't you say that first, and add that "other sources" cite it as Reigate? Yoninah (talk) 20:14, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copies of the entry for Scaramanga in the Register of Births at Reigate RD say* that he was born at a property called Rosemont in Meadvale, Reigate UD. This lies wholly within both the Borough of Reigate and Banstead, and the Reigate Parliamentary Contituency. During the eighteenth century it also lay within the Reigate census enumeration district 16. On the 1901 census he is listed as born in Reigate. On that basis he may be said to have been born there.
However, in the article for Meadvale, it is explained that postal addresses in the southern part of Meadvale fall within the town of Redhill. If Rosemont was in that part then Redhill would be a more specific description. Three sources locate Rosemont in Cronks Hill Road -
Kelly's Directory of Kent, Surrey & Sussex, 1891. [Part 3: Surrey], Page 1442
https://cdm16445.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p16445coll4/id/187347/rec/1
The 1881 Census of England and Wales. Surrey, Reigate Foreign, District 16, Page 2
The 1891 Census of England and Wales. Surrey, Reigate, District 16, Page 2
These sources relate to Henry Bourne, a retired plantation manager.
Given that Scaramaga's entry in the Census of 1911 says that he was born in Redhill then the article could simply say that alone. Deleting mention of Reigate would, in my view, improve the article. I propose doing so unless the sources are challenged or the change is considered WP:OR.
  • Scaramanga, James John, Q3 1898, Reigate, Surrey, Volume 2a, page 186
RAClarke (talk) 19:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Scaramanga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:James_Scaramanga&oldid=1198686664"