Talk:Jane Eisner

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jane Eisner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100527201144/http://www.brynmawr.edu/hepburn/fellows/fellow_07_eisner.shtml to http://www.brynmawr.edu/hepburn/fellows/fellow_07_eisner.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Offline} 11:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues[edit]

COI tag added as article created by SPI paid editor or subject. Article remains thin and seems to be borderline notabiltiy. Sourcing is largely related to the subject, there are unverified claims, and one entire section of puffery was sourced to a Wall Street Journal article that did not substantiate the claimed affiliation. Sourcing of entire article requires examination per BLP. Coretheapple (talk) 14:23 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Merged[edit]

I've WP:BOLDly merged with The Forward. This article began as a WP:DUCK self-written or paid editing COPVIO, lifted in toto from http://forward.com/author/jane-eisner/. Much of the self-promotion and puffery dropped out over the years, but it remains essentially a resume, sourced mainly to related entities, where there is sourcing at all. The only independent sourcing to speak of is a brief New York Times announcement of her appointment and a personal article on her daily routine, which together I think don't meet GNG. I noticed sourcing not supporting statements in the article, including a list of presumed credits sourced to a Wall Street Journal article that mentioned only one of them. Overall I think merger is the best solution. Coretheapple (talk) 16:34, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]