Talk:Jane F. Desforges

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 09:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

~~... that Jane F. Desforges, a professor at Tufts University Medical School, won the Outstanding Teacher Award for 13 consecutive years?~~ Source: "she received the Outstanding Teacher Award for 13 consecutive years."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/BlossomWatch

Created by 97198 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Hi 97198, review follows: article created 15 August; I make it just over minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I didn't pick up any issues with overly close paraphrasing; hook is interesting, mentioned in the article and checks out to source cited; a QPQ has been provided. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 07:04, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dumelow, 97198, Narutolovehinata5, Maile66, RoySmith, and TSventon: per discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Prep_3:_Jane_F._Desforges I'm reopening this nomination as this article currently has insufficient information about her career, which means it does not meet WP:DYKSG#D7: "Articles that fail to deal adequately with the topic are also likely to be rejected". — Amakuru (talk) 10:29, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per the WT:DYK discussion, I'm suggesting a few new ALTs. Note that the article needs to have the information added as it's currently not there:

ALT1 ... that Jane F. Desforges was the first woman to receive the American College of Physicians's Distinguished Teacher Award?

ALT2 ... that in 2007, the American College of Physicians renamed their Distinguished Teacher Award after Jane F. Desforges, the first woman to receive it?

I have a slight preference for ALT1 as it mentions her name earlier, but I'll leave it to the reviewer to decide. I've also struck ALT0 due to issues raised during the WT:DYK discussion. Pinging Dumelow for their thoughts. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:39, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 97198, are you able to expand this further? - Dumelow (talk) 09:09, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the nom hasn't been very active lately. Her last edit was on the 15th but she's only had two edits this month, with her most recent continuous activity being in August. I hope she comes back soon and addresses the concerns raised, but unless she comes back or another editor steps forward and addresses the concerns, there may not be a path forward for this nomination anymore. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 16:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I haven't been very active lately. I disagree that this article is incomplete but clearly I'm in the minority so feel free to reject. 97198 (talk) 00:08, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]