Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.
With respect to any reverting restrictions:
Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
This article I believe lacks a large amount of content. It would be great if someone would add onto this. (Cass) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassini127 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try to expand a bit in the coming day or two. Skycycle (talk) 02:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing as this is not the only bombing incident in Baghdad in January 2017, I propose a change to the title of the article.StrikeDog (talk) 07:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done (renamed January 2, ...). Tlhslobus (talk) 03:55, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am also removing the (unexplained) incomplete tag, on the assumption that it referred to those other January bombs.Tlhslobus (talk) 04:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
