Talk:Japan–Korea Agreement of August 1905

Article title

Is "agreement" the best or most appropriate word for this article name? The first paragraph of Treaty establishes a context for this thread:

"A treaty is an agreement under international law entered into by actors in international law, namely sovereign states and international organizations. A treaty may also be known as: (international) agreement, protocol, covenant, convention, exchange of letters, etc. Regardless of the terminology, all of these international agreements under international law are equally treaties and the rules are the same."

There are very clear pro- and con- arguments:

• Yes, in terms of WP:MOS#Article title and Wikipedia:Article titles because the word "agreement" is the diplomatic term used at Korea, treaties and agreements By Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, p. vii. This source is credible, and other reliable sources employ the term "agreement."
• No, in terms of the 1965 Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea, we know that the term "agreement" is an oxymoron because there was no agreement, neither then nor now -- compare Japan-Korea Protocol of August 1904#Recision and Lee Man-yeol. "For a view of history that puts us at the center," Northeast Asian History Foundation News. 2010.

I do not know what is best. --Tenmei (talk) 16:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Japan–Korea Agreement of August 1905. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005153650/http://english.historyfoundation.or.kr/data/Newsletterlist/1008_eng/sub02.html to http://english.historyfoundation.or.kr/data/Newsletterlist/1008_eng/sub02.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 22 November 2017 (UTC)