Talk:Japanese cruiser Izumo/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- See defence and defense.
- Link Knyaz Suvorov
- ...closer to the Russian border - closer than what?
- Dunno. The first landing was somewhere NE of Wonsan, but I can't find the name anywhere so it's probably some dinky fishing village or something, rendered in British English through Japanese from the original Korean.
- Might be worth a post at WP:KOREA - I've had some good luck finding place names in China and New Guinea from their old German names.
- Dunno. The first landing was somewhere NE of Wonsan, but I can't find the name anywhere so it's probably some dinky fishing village or something, rendered in British English through Japanese from the original Korean.
- Baja California shouldn't be italicized
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- File:Japanese cruiser Izumo in Kobe.jpg - needs a source
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Couldn't find the photo on Google image, so I deleted it as there's no clear evidence of publishing before '56. I've dealt with everything else, I think, so see if they suit. I hope that this is starting a trend for you to review more! Many thanks for knocking off my three.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)