Talk:Japanese settlement in the Marshall Islands

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeJapanese settlement in the Marshall Islands was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 4, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 6, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that because of the Japanese settlement in the Marshall Islands in the 1920s–1940s, about 10% of the islanders have some Japanese ancestry?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese settlement in the Marshall Islands/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this page against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    • Early contact (19th century): The pearl divers were believed to be murdered, after the Ada, a British trading ship found the skeletal remains of the pearl divers. bad phrasing, please rewrite for grammar and clarity. In fact the whole paragraph is very badly written. Is the implication that the ship, the Ada sent Japanese envoys?
    • Japanese administration (1914–1944): A military administration was established when Japan annexed the Marshall Islands from Germany in 1914, and a few Japanese administrators were stationed on the islands. A few Japanese businessmen from the South Seas Trading Company (Nanyo Boeki) also established a few trading stations at Rongrong, Talab and Majuro village between 1915 and 1918 repetitious phrasing.
    • In fact reading through the whole article it is full of repetitious phrasing, bad grammar and lacks clarity or coherence. Definitely a long way from GA status. Can you enlist the help of a copy-editor to improve it?
    b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    • I have to assume Good Faith for print references and Japanese sources.
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    • What is the significance of the photograph in the infobox? How does it relate to the article subject?
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    • This article as it stands is very poorly written. If a copy editor can be found to go through it line by line to improve the prose then it may make a good article. If this can be fixed in seven days or so, then good. If not, then it will fail. On hold. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • On hold status extended to 02 January 2010 at request of nominator. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:44, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • OK, the prose has not been substantially improved, in fact there has been little activity so I am not going to list this as this time. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Japanese settlement in the Marshall Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]