Talk:Jawe language

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Overseas France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Overseas France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Overseas FranceWikipedia:WikiProject Overseas FranceTemplate:WikiProject Overseas FranceOverseas France articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Balarcon1. Peer reviewers: Jpkulka, Wynn 629.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Morgan Peer Review[edit]

Your intro is good but maybe split it up into separate sections as it seems rather beefy to hook a reader. Show how the language is related to the other languages in its family. Your prose is quite good you keep it very matter of fact and to the point. which is refreshing in comparison to other peoples articles. It is good that you have a vocabulary but it would be nice to see more alphabet and phonology and the other stuff. Other wise its a good start but I really cant do that much from here since the document is completely unfinished.

Jason Peer Review[edit]

The intro gives good background details about the language, like where it's spoken and it's current status. The second paragraph could be broken up, however, as it makes the intro look unappealing. The language used is fine; it's brief and neutral.

There's more on the background on the language than the technical side, of which felt very specific to the language as opposed to having foundations on how the language works, but it's fine if the material isn't there or is hard to interpret.

For little nitpicks, the References section would look nicer if citations were reused as opposed to recited, as is the case with the Ethnologue citations. It would also be nice if the vocabulary list was sorted alphabetically. Other than what's been stated, the article reads solidly. Jpkulka (talk) 09:28, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]