This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
There are absolutely zero reasons for this wiki page to exist[edit]
Wikipedia abuses its reputation by appeasing the fame machine. This article is a disgrace. I pray for Jayden Bartels and hope she finds peace and freedom from the modeling industry. 99.165.35.182 (talk) 13:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Elaborate? She appears to be a reasonably well known public figure within her circles. I have personally never heard of her but the article does well to show why she is notable. --Nz101 (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the page is well-justified. Notability is a key factor in Wikipedia, which means being famous plays a role. So, complaining about fame machine is not a good reason to delete a well sourced article about a notable person. — Starforce13 14:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, this page is modeling industry spam. The "evidnece" that this person is famous is taken from "just trust me" formulas designed by website domain operators. There is no hard evidence that the website domain operators claiming various "viewer" or "subscriber" counts are reporting interaction statistics honestly. The modeling industry claims that some models are "famous" in order to support the careers of mediocre performers and artists. This is a game that is played when there is no fame involved at all, only claims that someone is famous with ABSOLUTELY ZERO EVIDENCE OFFERED IN SUPPORT OF THESE DUBIOUS CLAIMS. If you think someone is "famous" when there is (1) no hard evidence to support this claim (2) good reason to think individuals associated with the subject would like to manipulate Wikipedia in order to create the impression of fame then guess what: IT LOOKS LIKE SOMEBODY IS ABUSING & VANDALIZING WIKIPEDIA. 99.165.35.182 (talk) 15:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Y'all are happy to nominate this article for deletion if you want. I'm not sure on notability (which is why I placed a flag on the article as possibly not meeting the guidelines; hoping to see if people respond and maybe add more info about her career) but Wikipedia isn't intended to be a fame machine. It may have that unintended consequence, but don't do the same thing that society did to the Illuminati and stray Wikipedia too far from its original messages/founding principles. InvadingInvader (talk) 08:21, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
She is now 20 and that is an outdated source. I an not sure we need to say that at all, but we need to stop saying it in the present tense.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
