This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
If there's no objection I propose renaming this "Jean Hey" with a redirect for "Master of Moulins". Ewulp 01:38, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Update: still researching this. Acceptance of Jean Hey as the painter of this body of work seems nearly unanimous, although some sources, such as the Yale Dictionary of Art and Artists (2000) continue to hedge. Their article is called Master of Moulins and explains that he "is sometimes identified with Jean Hey". More typical is The Oxford Companion to Western Art (2001), which crossreferences "Master of Moulins" to the Jean Hey article, and considers the case closed. My research, still fairly skimpy, has found no sources that argue against this identification. Virtually all museums, on their wall labels and websites, have replaced the M of M attribution with Hey. Ewulp 23:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
