Talk:Jenks' Day Off

Jenks' Day Off has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 13, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Film: Silent / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jenks' Day Off/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DepressedPer (talk · contribs) 13:10, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take another stab at a silent short film article.

Here's what I found in this article:

Lead

It's written well and encapsulate what the article is about.
The lead says the film is a 'comedy', but the categories say its a drama.

Fixed that. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

No problems in here as well.

Production

Well sourced and has good information.

Release and reception

"The Morning Telegraph gave a passing positive review" → "The Morning Telegraph gave a positive review of the film", much better.

Done. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move the theatre advertisements sentence in front of the The Morning Telegraph sentence.

Done. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Link some of the publishers in the sources if possible.

That's what I think about the article. I'll put it on hold for you to fix the problems. DepressedPer (talk) 20:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DepressedPer: All set. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this article a GA. DepressedPer (talk) 08:12, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.