Talk:Jennifer Mills News

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Heyo! Been seeing your articles over at the new page patrol, they all seem quite decent and nicely written, keep up the good work!

A bit confused about the format unit in the infobox, doesn't seem to be supported by any citation in the text and I would say that publication is mainly online and I think I've read that there's been an exhibition with it printed as A4. Why did you put it as broadsheet?

Anyways nice work and happy editing!

Justiyaya 03:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 12:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Spaghettifier (talk). Self-nominated at 21:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Jennifer Mills News; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Verified that the article is long enough, that there are no plagiarism concerns through the Copyvios tool and spotchecking, and that the hook is sourced in the article. Cunard (talk) 10:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Both hooks are verified. The second hook is verified as being part of the 23 May 2023 edition at https://jennifermillsnews.tumblr.com/image/716487357770203136. I recommend using the first hook because it is sourced to an independent source. The second hook is sourced to a primary source from the subject herself, and I don't know what the DYK rules say regarding that. Great work on this interesting topic! Cunard (talk) 10:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK orphan (!)[edit]

I've never seen before an orphaned article that got into "Did you know…" section. Is this the first occurence or such situations did happen in the past?

Just being curious, 79.163.210.208 (talk) 00:17, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know, but somebody added it to Wikipedia:Unusual articles now. VintageVernacular (talk) 07:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]