Talk:Jennifer Robinson (lawyer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tag about information subjective and not real[edit]

Why is this tag here? The article looks well referenced, factual and well rounded. Which part in particular is subjective. If this cannot be identified, I'd remove this tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.125.110.60 (talk) 16:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Why would they delete her? If she pops up in random news articles about wikileaks, she's worthy of a wiki article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.169.189.229 (talk) 15:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TALK[edit]

A TALK page for Jennifer would be nice; so this starts one. "You'll thank me later." — Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 23:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Snowden[edit]

Jennifer Robinson is mentioned on the page of Sarah_Harrison_(journalist) as a more suitable choice to help Edward Snowden FYI, Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 23:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

words from the lead[edit]

here are words removed from the lead that aren't discussed in the body of the article (awaiting appropriate references):

"She has been instructed as junior counsel in the Court of Appeal in human rights-related judicial review cases, has advised individual and state clients in international law and has given expert evidence at the UN and in Parliament in the UK. She serves as a trustee of Article 19 and the Bureau for Investigative Journalism and is on the advisory board of the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights. She is a founding board member of the Grata Fund, Australia’s first independent public interest litigation fund, which has supported key strategic human rights cases. She has previously served on the Executive Committee of the Commonwealth Lawyers Association and conducted trial observation and human rights missions for the International Bar Association." Coolabahapple (talk) 13:30, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid links[edit]