This article was nominated for deletion on 21 April 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Dthomsen8, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on May 2015. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: awaiting deletion decision

First update[edit]

I have removed all of the subsections and links under ``Mainstream media attention. I believe this addresses the substance of the criticisms ``cleanup|reason=external links, unneeded/unencyclopedic sections, WP:NOTDIR, etc.|date=April 2013. I have also removed use of all bullet points, and pointed to the videos using external references, rather than inline text which I believe addresses ``external links|date=April 2013.

Second Update[edit]

Added internal links so no longer an orphan:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nico_Smith#Anti-apartheid_activism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond_War#Framework_for_a_Public_Peace_Process
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_Dialogue_Group#History_of_the_organization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neve_Shalom#History — Preceding unsigned comment added by BenjaminGittins (talk • contribs) 20:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Layout[edit]

what else needs to be done to comply with layout guidelines? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan-nl (talk • contribs) 02:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC) As work has been performed to improve the layout, and several months have passed sin Dan-nl has raised this question, and no one has raised any issues, I'm removing the layout warning from this page. Benjamin Gittins (talk) 21:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copying editing[edit]

what else needs to be done in order to comply with the copy editing guidelines? Dan-nl (talk) 13:04, 9 September 2013 (UTC) As work has been performed to improve the editing, and several months have passed sin Dan-nl has raised this question, and no one has raised any issues, I'm removing the layout warning from this page. Benjamin Gittins (talk) 21:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

what else needs to be done in order to comply with the external links guidelines? Dan-nl (talk) 13:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC) As work has been performed to improve the links, and several months have passed sin Dan-nl has raised this question, and no one has raised any issues, I'm removing the layout warning from this page. Benjamin Gittins (talk) 21:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

=Citations[edit]

I see that one of the tags mentions "This article needs additional citations for verification. " but I don't see any citation requests in the article itself. What citations are needed? Thank youUnicorn46 (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that citations be added for any uncited text. --Epeefleche (talk) 03:02, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I first would like to thank everyone who has helped to improve this article. As a relatively new editor, I have learned much from the process and hope to take that learning on to edit other articles and perhaps one day initiate one on my own. I would like to follow up on the tags that remain on the article to see if the sources and citations, which have been expanded considerably, meet the criteria to allow that tag to be removed. In addition, if there are no objections, I'd like to remove the layout tag as it seems to me that the current layout - thanks to the help of more experienced editors than I - has been improved and, it seems to me, with that improvement is within the guidelines applied to other articles. Unicorn46 (talk) 19:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because it has been 8 days since I posted the request that the tags be hidden for this article and because there has been no feed back objecting to the suggestion; I have been informed by an editor much more experienced than myself, that it is not inappropriate to hide the tags. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank everyone again who helped with improving this article.Unicorn46 (talk) 02:42, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jewish-Palestinian Living Room Dialogue Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130128091159/http://www.law.stanford.edu/node/149750 to http://www.law.stanford.edu/node/149750

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]