This article is within the scope of WikiProject Stagecraft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.StagecraftWikipedia:WikiProject StagecraftTemplate:WikiProject StagecraftStagecraft articles
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles
I suggest that the title of this article be changed to: Jig (theatre). The phenomenon was and is known as a “jig”, and various adjectives, such a s stage, theatre, or Elizabethan are often added to it by recent historians, but not always — such adjectives are not attached and fixed. And the adjective “stage” doesn’t have much history. I think that if a person hears of a “jig” and wants to find out about it, they will look for “jig” and if they see “jig (theatre)” they’ll know that’s what they are looking for. A “stage jig” might not seem right to someone looking for a jig of the Elizabethan era. Zugzwanggambit (talk) 05:09, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
The change was made. Thanks. Zugzwanggambit (talk) 14:20, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]