Talk:Job Creators Network

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

"Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez hits back at Times Square billboard that blames her for Amazon canceling its New York HQ2". Pulse Nigeria. February 21, 2019.
"Ocasio-Cortez blasts Times Square Amazon billboard as 'wack' and 'billionaire-funded'". Fox News. February 21, 2019.

Forbes[edit]

@Ewen Douglas: WP:RSP says:

Most content on Forbes.com is written by contributors with minimal editorial oversight, and is generally unreliable. Editors show consensus for treating Forbes.com contributor articles as opinion pieces or self-published sources. Articles that have also been published in the print edition of Forbes are excluded, and are considered generally reliable. Check the byline to determine whether an article is written by "Forbes Staff" or a "Contributor", and check underneath the byline to see whether it was published in a print issue of Forbes. See also the entry for Forbes.

The article you added [1] says in the byline that it is written by a contributor; therefore, it is unreliable. wumbolo ^^^ 21:56, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wumbolo is correct. We treat content by staff writers of Forbes differently than content by Forbes contributors. I removed another instance of a use of a Forbes contributor's piece. Marquardtika (talk) 01:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]