Talk:John Angelo Jackson/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Untitled

I've not researched the Wikipedia Biography section, but would I be right in saying that the Biography section permits a deeper delving and hence a much longer entry. It seems that a POV maybe permitted. Is the above true, any assistance will be gratefully reveived. (Gowron 12:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)).

No, WP:NPOV applies to all articles. However, a POV may be included provided that other POVs are also given fair and balanced coverage.--Runcorn 21:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to reply. I'll have to read up and find out what the Biography section does that this section does not. Thanks again (Gowron 09:48, 14 October 2006 (UTC))

Information on John Angelo Jackson is on Wikipedia's entry.

I would rate this article as "B" class. The two examples given in the start class contain far less information, images, supporting documentation, references and external links than this article. (217.41.244.66 12:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC))

I support this.--Runcorn 21:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Dismbiguation

I've added this article to the disambiguation page John Jackson. If there are any other names he should be known by, please create a redirect - happy to help.--Runcorn 16:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey cheers for that Runcorn, I'll take that advice and have a look. (Gowron 12:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC))

File:Early-pyb-jaj.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Early-pyb-jaj.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:32, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:John Angelo Jackson/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I'm not sure what this page DOES that the discussion in the article DOES NOT? (Gowron 11:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC))

I would rate this article as "B" class. The two examples given in the start class contain far less information, images, supporting documentation, references and external links than this article. (|217.41.244.66| 12:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC))

I support this.--Runcorn 21:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Last edited at 17:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 20:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)