Talk:John Butters Power Station

	Australia portal John Butters Power Station is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Energy Start‑class Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pumped-storage power station?[edit]

Is it Pumped-storage power station? Because this is what the infobox says; however, there is no mentioning pumped-storage in the body text. There is a field called 'pumps' but it says 'Fuji Francis turbine' which is a turbine, not a pump. If it is not pumped-storage power station, it should use the {{Infobox dam}} instead of. The documentation of the the {{Infobox power station}} says: For hydroelectric power stations involving dams (except tidal facilities), please use {{Infobox dam}}. Beagel (talk) 09:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Butters had a 7 km long tunnel made, one of the largest drilling programs of its sort at the time in Tasmania through mount jukes from the level of the crotty dam, and it descended to the turbine. There is nothing anywhere suggesting that there was a pump storage system on the King River power scheme JarrahTree 15:19, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is what the current infobox suggests. Beagel (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it took so long for me to see this one. Some pumped-storage stations have an infobox dam, like Grand'Maison Dam. It is usually cases when the dam is the most notable part of the system and subsequently, the upper or lower reservoir (whichever the subject dam creates), is substantially larger than its opposite. In systems when the dams and reservoirs are similar sizes, infobox power station tends to apply. I see that opinion doesn't matter much more though...--NortyNort (Holla) 01:09, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]