Talk:John Henry Johnson/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: BlackJack (talk · contribs) 12:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Starting review[edit]
I'll do this one. Will start soon. Jack | talk page 12:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- @BlackJack: Pardon my discourtesy, but will you be reviewing soon? Lizard (talk) 16:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Lizard the Wizard:No problem, Lizard. I did intend to do this sooner rather than later but I've been busy elsewhere. Leave it with me. Thanks. Jack | talk page 16:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Full review criteria checks[edit]
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for the six good article criteria:
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and embedded lists:
- A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable with no original research?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Inline citations to reliable sources where necessary (e.g., direct quotations):
- C. No original research:
- D. No copyright violations:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
Summary[edit]
Well, this one is as good as it can get. It's a well-written, interesting and throroughly sourced article that fully deserves GA status so I'm passing it without any requests for improvement as, if I had any, I would be guilty of pedantic nitpicking. It is a very good article indeed about a man who was a long-term top-class player. Well done. Jack | talk page 20:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)