Talk:Join five

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

I was shown this game as long as a decade ago. I don't remember who it was I learned it from. I find it handy for passing a few hours in hideously long sales meetings. --Spblat 03:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the internal dots of the initial cross are not needed to play this. Dreg743 on 80.186.254.44 (talk) 05:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have two points that need to be clarified on (This sounds like an interesting game I can play to pass time, so I want to know for sure). 1. So if I use the outline version, am I allowed to draw in more than one dot? 2. Can I save more than one dot? For example, if i drew two lines, both using five pre-existing dots, do I get to put down three at my next move? -Janceyn —Preceding unsigned comment added by JanceyN (talkcontribs) 16:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC) Not exactly sure what you're asking. You have one dot per line (turn) to draw and if you don't have to use it you've saved it for later use. 80.186.25.21 (talk) 17:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Join Five. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:40, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]