This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
I believe the lead should include the sourced info from later in the page, "As of June 2023, Tester had voted in line with Joe Biden's position 91% of the time during Biden's presidency." This is simply to balance info with the claim that he is a "moderate or centrist Democrat" in the lead, which is somewhat disingenous and missing context considering his voting record. Please engage with me, without simply removing this concern. 2600:1008:A103:D3DC:5DDB:6F1D:E6DF:6F53 (talk) 22:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As a rule, it does not hurt to include more impartial, factual, sourced information in the lead (Rather than burying it lower in the page), unless it it somehow completely extraneous or unneccesary. 2600:1008:A103:D3DC:5DDB:6F1D:E6DF:6F53 (talk) 22:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For me, this wouldn't be WP:DUE for the lead, though it certainly is for the greater article. Sources call him a moderate or centrist far more often than they bring up his percentage of agreement with Biden. To juxtapose the two in the lead would strike me as implying that they are equal narratives in the reliable sources, which, to my eye, they are not. All that said, happy to go wherever consensus leads. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 22:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I concur. No disingenuity, it's simply using verbiage that is very commonly used to describe Mr. Tester. His scorecard for how often he votes with the president is pretty much never raised. We've never had the "voting-with-presidents" percentage included in any politician's lead to the best of my knowledge; Tony Gonzales for example has a pretty strong record of voting against Biden but is still referred to in his lede as a moderate Republican, without this needing to be mentioned. It works either way. ser!(chat to me - see my edits) 22:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see no reason why this should be in the lede. Marquardtika (talk) 15:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
