Talk:Joseph Berrios

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good articleJoseph Berrios has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 30, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
October 18, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Joseph Berrios/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 04:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't planning on reviewing this, but since no one else at GAN seems to care and I'm already doing a copyright check on this article, might as well kill two birds with one stone. Wizardman 04:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Hugh (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Going through all the references over the next 24-48 hours to check both for reliability and copyright issues. That'll be the crux of the review once that's finally done. I did some a while back so I've made progress already. Wizardman 01:04, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright issues are now resolved. Here are the concerns I found in the article:

  • The last ref is a deadlink; fix or remove.
Green tickY Removed. Hugh (talk) 04:00, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The personal life section would be better combined with the rest of the article. It's the type of article where having that extra section, especially with so little in it, seems pointless.
Green tickY Combined. Hugh (talk) 04:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a one sentence paragraph in the article; combine it in so it's not hanging.
Green tickY Combined. Hugh (talk) 04:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The lead it a little on the small side given the size of the article, though that's more personal preference than anything.
Green tickY Lead expanded. Hugh (talk) 04:41, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article's now on hold, just make those fixes and I'll pass it. Wizardman 02:48, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Everything checks out, article now passes. Wizardman 14:53, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Hugh (talk) 02:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]