Talk:Jugun

Australia: Western Australia / Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Australia portal Jugun is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Western Australia Kimberley

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Western Australia Kimberley, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Kimberley on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Western Australia KimberleyWikipedia:WikiProject Western Australia KimberleyTemplate:WikiProject Western Australia KimberleyWestern Australia Kimberley articles

comment from 2016[edit]

Per my edit, the native title determination makes Djugan part of the Yawuru native title holding group. However, that decision was controversial (as evidenced by the fact that it needed to be decided on by the Federal Court). The judgment referred to (^[1]) goes into a lot of detail about it. Also, query whether "Djugan" should be made the dominant spelling in this article as that seems to be the "official" spelling at least in native title circles. Miskate (talk) 02:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/FCA/2006/82.html

Change the article title[edit]

Can anyone just change this title 'Australia' is not needed as a qualifier of this class of tribal articles. I suggest Djugun or Jukun.Nishidani (talk) 13:48, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well there is a Jukun people (West Africa) article, so the ugly parenthetical disambiguator actually is necessary. We can't easily move it to Djugun, as that page is not a redirect to this article; the move has to be done by an admin, but it shouldn't be a problem as long as it's considered "non-controversial". Same applies to Jukun. --NSH001 (talk) 09:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/FCA/2006/82.html

[1]