Jump to content

Talk:Juliet as a Young Girl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDance: Ballet
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Taskforce icon
This redirect is supported by WikiProject Ballet.
WikiProject Ballet To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconClassical music: Compositions
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this redirect or visit the project page for more details.
Taskforce icon
This redirect is supported by Compositions task force.

Merger into Romeo and Juliet (Prokofiev)[edit]

(Copying and modifying my proposal and rationale from Montagues and Capulets.) I propose to merge "Juliet as a Young Girl" into Romeo and Juliet. Why an individual movement from a ballet merits its own article isn't adequately explained. The "Allegro con brio" from Beethoven's Fifth or any number of dances from Tchaikovsky's The Nutcracker are among the most famous and oft-referenced pieces of classical music in existence; none have any separate articles to themselves. Moreover, this article has hardly any information, certainly not enough to justify needing its own article. But whatever helpful information that is contained here could be neatly enfolded back into the article on the complete score. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 07:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support this suggestion. Montagues and Capulets is a little more comprehensive, but ultimately the Romeo and Juliet article is not particularly lengthy and seems to me this content would sit better in the main article. TheEmeraldBeyond (talk) 22:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Forgot to comment here, but given the supports above, my own support and no other comments for over a year, I went ahead and redirected the movement. Best – Aza24 (talk) 17:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]