Talk:Juventus Next Gen/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AideDésintéressée (talk · contribs) 18:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I'll start the review tonight. The article looks good to me so I don't think it will take a long time. Hopefully, it may be done before tomorrow evening! AideDésintéressée (talk) 18:05, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

Assessment

@Wikipediæ philosophia @Nehme1499

The whole article seems very good and solid to me. I have no complaints except a few minor issues (reference for the stadium's capacity and staff members who were not cited) that I've just corrected myself but I can now promote this article to GA class. Congratulations and thank you both for your all your work. AideDésintéressée talk 19:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 19:54, 15 July 2023 (UTC)