Talk:KAI KT-1 Woongbi

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Asian / Korean Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name?[edit]

Current Korean Romanization would spell 웅비 as Ungbi 104.34.233.207 (talk) 02:12, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Except we don't use the current Korean romanization, we use the common name in English. However, based on my - admittedly limited - reading, that would appear not to be "Wooongbi" but rather "Woong Bee". - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:32, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Korean Government officially changed its Romanization to Revised Romanization of Korean. Thus, Woongbi, which is an old form, should be changed into Ungbi. 104.34.233.207 (talk) 02:12, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doesnt really matter what the Korean Government do it is the common name in English that is important. Do we know where the name comes from as it is not used on either the company or the ROKAF websites? MilborneOne (talk) 14:18, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to figure out how ROKAF or ROK government actually spell KT-1 in English. So far, KAI only uses "basic trainer aircraft" and does not give any nickname to it.Kadrun (talk) 23:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KAI KT-1 Woongbi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150321020814/http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/two-indonesian-aircraft-collide-in-mid-air-ahead-of-lima-exhibition to http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/two-indonesian-aircraft-collide-in-mid-air-ahead-of-lima-exhibition

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Armament[edit]

Hi, I think we should include this extra information, please discuss CanadianScotNationalist (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The specs are for the KT-1, while the source clearly states the model involved was a KA-1. I've removed it again. Also, we don't generally add armament based on incidental usage, but from reliable sources that detail the weapons used by a particular variant. BilCat (talk) 21:29, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the edition of Jane's (2004-5)used for a reference for the specs refers to two stores stations under each wing, which are fitted with some sort of high-tech light bomb carriers on the KT-1 and what appear to be more normal pylons on the XKO-1. The 2007-8 edition refers to two stores stations under each wing for the KO-1 and the KT-1C, with a range of rocket pod, machine-gun pods or auxiliary fuel tanks. It also mentions a possible 5th underfuselage station, which can take bombs or sensor pods. Neither edition refers by name to the KA-1 but this may be the same as the KO-1 - Jane's refers to 20 being ordered by South Korea, which matches how many KA-1s that our article says Korea has (without any sources).Nigel Ish (talk) 22:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I believe this refers to the same plane; different names are sometimes used for the same thing albeit a proper investigation is perhaps required CanadianScotNationalist (talk) 15:49, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weapons for the KA-1[edit]

I wish to add the following information to the specs part of the page: 70 mm rockets and a 12.7 mm gun pod ^[1]^[2]

It has been used in combat against North Korea drones. Likewise if the North tries this again then light attack aircraft (like this) and helicopters will be the primary response. Like in Ukraine it’s flak guns, not S-300s that you need. You can’t send a T-50 or a F-35. This is also the second manned aircraft to go down chasing drones, after that Ukrainian MiG-29 was lost to a Shahed-136.

Likewise if war breaks out it would used as ground attack. Jjmclellan82 (talk) 08:51, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned in the previous section, the specs are for the KT-1, not the KA-1, which is a different variant. BilCat (talk) 10:03, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Ashish Dangwal (27 December 2022). "Another Fighter Jet Goes Down While Attempting To Combat A 'Cheap' Suicide Drone? Comes After Ukraine Lost MiG-29 To Shahed-136". Retrieved 28 December 2022.
^ HOWARD ALTMAN, TYLER ROGOWAY (26 December 2022). "First North Korean Drone Intrusion In Five Years Spurs South To Scramble". Retrieved 29 December 2022.

[1] Ashish Dangwal (27 December 2022). "Another Fighter Jet Goes Down While Attempting To Combat A 'Cheap' Suicide Drone? Comes After Ukraine Lost MiG-29 To Shahed-136". Retrieved 28 December 2022.

[2] HOWARD ALTMAN, TYLER ROGOWAY (26 December 2022). "First North Korean Drone Intrusion In Five Years Spurs South To Scramble". Retrieved 29 December 2022.

[1]

[2]