Talk:KASUMI

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cipher Description[edit]

The description of the cipher does not work. More specifically the description of the FI function is wrong, and none of the sources I have looked at actually describe the algorithm the way the article does. During one of the steps (l0 to l1), it specifies to use a 9 bit number with a 7 bit substitution box. So implementing the algorithm as described will result in code that will not work, therefore the description must be wrong. The description needs to either be removed entirely, or changed so that it is accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.209.6.226 (talk) 06:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the first line the symbols and were the wrong way around.Lauri.pirttiaho (talk) 11:28, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ETSI spec[edit]

It's unclear to me as to whether the KASUMI cipher can be used in applications outside 3G. Description of licensing terms would be helpful. Cmcqueen1975 (talk) 14:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The external link http://global.mitsubishielectric.com/pdf/advance/vol100/03Vol100_TR2.pdf is broken as the pdf is no longer retrieveble at that URL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.171.254.96 (talk) 01:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Current deployment vs A5/1?[edit]

Where is A5/3 deployed now, compared to A5/1? Given http://lwn.net/Articles/365052/ it would be useful to know more about this. --NealMcB (talk) 06:26, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, KASUMI (A5/3) is used exclusively in UMTS 3G cell phone networks. However, do note that this doesn't make UMTS users secure -- an active attacker can easily force a cell phone to revert back to the old, insecure GSM network. -- intgr [talk] 17:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KASUMI. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:49, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KASUMI. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]