Talk:KQEH

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

When will KTEH air another anime? --Ryanasaurus0077 12:17, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing against this particular type of programming, but anime, science fiction, fantasy, etc., are not KTEH's staple programming. However, much of the article would suggest they are, yet tonight and the next few nights are "Six Wives of Henry VIII," "Hometime," Jean-Michael Cousteau, "History Detectives," and such. And the daytime is full of children's programming. Very different. So, perhaps the mentions of obscure anime programming could be omitted and maybe moved over here to the discussion page. If anyone has non-anime/-sci-fi trivia, that might be helpful. Michael Patrick 04:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Science Fiction was a staple of Sunday nights for over a decade, but it was solely because of viewer support. Once that support went away, so did the programming. Sci-Fi continued after the demise of the Sunday Sci-Fi night with various Dr. Who related programs, cheesy b-movies, and in 2005 with the introduction of Cinema Insomnia with Mr. Lobo. Dprisoner 05:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to delete almost all the Programming section, because, sorry, it's simply not true that KTEH is a "sci-fi/anime station," while the section represents it as one. Even if it did air that kind of programming every Sunday night for a decade in the past, it was still only Sunday nights and not the whole week -- and it was in the past. Just as a first step, I've removed the second paragraph in that section. It just sounds as if it were written by one person who really, really likes that stuff and ignores the rest of the station's programming. Michael Patrick 21:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see that this infromation has been removed. Shouldn't it be retained, and placed in history, or under a new subsection regarding programming history?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KTEH.jpg[edit]

Image:KTEH.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Station ID and Transmitters[edit]

I'm confused about these. As far as I can tell (looking for reliable links) the Program is branded "KQED Plus" -- but the actual transmitters are now KQEH (Monument Peak, near Milpitas) and KQET (Fremont Peak, near San Bautiste). I added a link to Monument Peak in the lede -- the coordinates are given in the sidebar, so maybe the link could be put there. Alanf777 (talk) 18:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KQEH. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]