Talk:Kaibiles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit[edit]

The part about cutting an X shaped wound in their leg to perform field surgery is bull. Whoever wrote it says "Kaibiles are known for doing medical work on themselves in the line of fire. For example, most kabiles **perform this bull thing**.

Most? Are there some that don't? Maybe the smart ones don't do this because they'd probably continue to make sure that the person who just shot them is dead before starting to cut random X's on your body wherever you're bleeding. Anyway, I think that the statement is dumb enough and hasn't been confirmed a fact since 2007, we should remove this garbage? HERE HERE!!! Vote 1 Wgfcrafty (talk) 20:23, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I agree, this article is pretty poorly written. Anyone with the most rudimentary knowledge of ballistics would know that a bullet fragments or greatly expands when it enters a body. Cutting an X and removing the bullet isn't possible. If for some reason a person was still alive after being shot, simply removing the bullet in the manner stated would do more harm than good. Stopping the massave blood loss would probably be a better idea. This article is very, very questionable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.9.121.123 (talk) 18:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recruitment of Kaibiles by Zeta Cartel[edit]

It is likely that a higher number of drop outs and failures from the training program join narcotrafficing organizations. There are six times as many people tested as there are who graduate from the program. It is possible for a successful graduate to get high wage work easily in legitimate security.RichardBond (talk) 22:13, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

US involvement?[edit]

The article includes a picture of US Navy troops in some kind of training exercise, without much explanation as to the context. What is the relationship between the US and the Kaibiles? 67.188.230.128 (talk) 02:51, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaibiles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kaibiles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]