Talk:Kalabagh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kalabagh's Status[edit]

Kalabagh was never a full fledged Princely State of the Indian Empire or of Pakistan. Kalabagh was a jagir who's leader held the title of Nawab, but it was never even given the status of a third class state. For a list of the Princely States of Pakistan please go to historical regions of Pakistan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.246.153 (talk) 19:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, seriously, this entire article is just a back and forth over the etymology of the name, which is CLEARLY of Turko-Persian origin. Hindu nationalist jackasses who want to impose their Hindu pseudo history on Pakistan really need to learn some boundaries.

There were many ancient states such as Kalabagh etc.Who did not comply fully with the british rules and so were not made into the so called"Princely states".But that does not change their place in history nor their rulers ancestral Titles.So restoring the title. Yoohooyoo (talk) 17:56, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With credible historical sources of course.you cannot change real history so deal with it. Yoohooyoo (talk) 17:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sikh invasion[edit]

Does this refer to Battle of Attock of 1813. If so this info should be added to the article. Hanif792 (talk) 18:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually no this happened in the 1820s a bit before the battle of mankera in 1822 in which the nawab of mankera whose state had borders with the state of the nawab of kalabagh was totally defeated by hari singh nalwa the reason the nawab of kalabagh was saved was that his state was on both sides of the river indus which formed a natural barrier and his hereditary fort of than kot and his summer capital of kalabagh and most of his fertile area all were on the opposite side of the river so the took almost 90 percent of his state on their side of the river but the bitter fighting there taught them a lesson and they did not try to stretch their luck and so never crossed the river but rather set their sights towards mankera and later multan Yoohooyoo (talk) 19:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fort name was dhan kot not than kot my mistake Yoohooyoo (talk) 19:30, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]