Talk:Kang Kek Iew

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What does Duch mean? Does this word have any particular meaning?[edit]

I'm Polish and in my language Duch (pronounced dooh] means exactly "Ghost" so for years, when I was reading Polish newspapers and articles I thought that this was a Polish TRANSLATION of his nom de guerre. Now, to my suprise I have just discovered that Duch [pronounced roughly "Deuch" or "Diuk"] is in fact a TRANSLITERATION of some Khmer word so my question is - does this word mean something? Now I know that it doesn't mean "Ghost" for sure but is there any meaning in it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.22.27.20 (talk) 17:01, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i always assumed it was french or psuedo-french meaning "leader" somehow, similar to italian "il duce" or the english term "duke". any khmer speakers here clear this up pls?! 67.150.82.192 (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kang Kek Iew vs Kang Kek Lew[edit]

I am not familiar with the Cambodia language, so I'm going to ask. Is this name capitalized correctly? English names capitalize all first letters. Example, John Jacob Smith. However, I know that not all lanugae do, so Kang Kek lew may be correct using the lowercase "lew" instead of the uppercase "Lew". So I’m asking, is this correct, or do we need to replace all the “l”’s with “L”’s. I have absolute no idea.

It's an "i" not an "L". Cmacauley (talk) 01:29, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, now I feel like an idiot. Thank you for clarifying the obvious for me. The whole time I thought it was an "L" even though the "I" was staring me in the face. Again, thanks.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 12:57, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Age-date discrepancy[edit]

The article states that he was born in 1942, and that "he passed his Brevet d'Etudes Secondaire de Première in 1961 at the age of fifteen". Only one of these statements can be true. ---Sluzzelin talk 14:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More accurately he may have been born in 1942 and passed the Brevet d'Etudes Secondaire de Première in 1961 but not at the age of fifteen (seem a fairly late age to get a secondary qualification particularly in those days) or he may have been born in 1942 and passed his Brevet d'Etudes Secondaire de Première at the age of fifteen but not in 1961 or he passed his Brevet d'Etudes Secondaire de Première in 1961 at the age of fifteen but wasn't born in 1942 :-P Nil Einne (talk) 09:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The image of the young Iek... doesn't look like a 17 year-old boy; maybe he's 7 ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.84.199.70 (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Duncan book the photo shows Kang Kek Eau aged about 17. Until we find a better source, we have to stay with the 17. Thaths (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trial section needs to be written better[edit]

The Trial section of the article was written piecemeal as the trial was happening and there were many twists and turns. Now that we have had time for the trial and its aftermath to sink in, I think this section needs to be rewritten to read better than a chronology of dates and events. -- Thaths (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kang Kek Iew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"江玉耀"[edit]

This Chinese name was introduced to zh.wp and en.wp in 2015. This Google search finds pre-2015 sources but very, very few.

  1. http://www.7jpz.com/thread-465-1-1.html - a forum post from 2010 that claims to reference a Chinese newspaper in Cambodia???
  2. http://www.jinbianwanbao.cn/news/372.html - 2010 news article
  3. http://www.jinbianwanbao.com/List.asp?ID=6060 - 2011 news article from the same website as above

suzukaze (tc) 08:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kang Kek Iew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drive By Citation Needed is making me less motivated to contribute to this article[edit]

There has been a recent spate of adding citation needed tags to every single sentence of this article. Honestly, this is passive aggressiveness couched as earnestness. I am losing my motivation to contribute to this article (which I have done significantly over the years). The calls for citation are overly aggressive, in my opinion, because:

  • Every. Single. Sentence cannot be cited. Usually, paragraphs are written with the citation for the preceding few sentences being cited at the end of the collection of sentences.
  • The article will be come unreadable if Every. Single. Sentence. Is. Cited.

I have read articles of how some overeager editors have driven contributors away from contributing to Wikipedia. I see a prime example of this in action in this article.

Thaths (talk) 22:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]