Talk:Karim Benzema/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    In the Early career section, "Benzema is a product of the Olympique Lyonnais Academy", what do you mean with "product"? Same section, "Benzema quickly ascending up the ranks", do you mean "ascend"? In the Breakout season, "...switched to the number 10 shirt and was given control of the attack", what do you mean with "attack"? Same section, 2008-09 season, and Real Madrid, "In the Champions League, Benzema scored an important brace against Rangers at Ibrox Park", "Karim got off to a good start for the 2008–09 season scoring a brace in Lyon's opening league match", "He was among the top scorers in the UEFA Champions League group stage, scoring five goals,[37] a brace against Steaua Bucureşti", "...and winning only two with Benzema scoring only two goals in that stretch, a brace against Le Mans in a 3–1 victory", and "On 24 August, Benzema netted a brace in Real Madrid's 4–0 victory", what do you mean with "brace"? In the International career section, the beginning of this sentence ---> "He featured with the under-18 team", reads odd. Same section, "...and after a muted performance", what do you mean with "muted"?
    Man, you stole my strike thing. :) Anyways, check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:42, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    In the lead, link "Real Madrid" once. In the Breakout season, link "out of bounds" and "brace" to their correspondence articles. Linking "" might help. In the Real Madrid section, it would be best to add Raúl's last name. In the International career section, "He has now adopted the number ten for France" ---> "He has now adopted the number 10 for France".
    Check.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    Reference 6, "lepoint.fr" ---> "Le Point". Reference 20 is missing Publisher info. There's a dead link.
    Done, ref 20 was a Youtube link Spiderone 17:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Are YouTube videos even reliable sources? What makes that particular video reliable? Is it infringement on copyright etc? --Jimbo[online] 21:07, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    The Brace (sports) article, which detailed what a brace in sports is was removed. I think the majority of readers of his page certainly know what a brace in football is. Joao10Siamun (talk) 23:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I replaced the YouTube video Spiderone 08:14, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Majority of your readers might know what "brace" means. I am not one of those people. But, I'm glad that this was sorted out. Another, check.
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    Is there a source for this ---> "The bad form resulted in Lyon losing their grip on 1st place position and eventually falling out of the title race, thus ending their streak of seven consecutive Ligue 1 titles. Benzema was a part of four of those title runs"?
    Check.
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
    In the Breakout season, "Benzema continued through to goal and capped the run by blasting a right-footed shot past the shocked Croat Vedran Runje", "blasting" seems like POV. Same section, this ---> "Benzema continued his great form scoring" sounds like POV. In the 2008–09 season, "Due to his great start", POV.
    Check.
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you to everyone who got the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:42, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]