Talk:Kasla, Jerusalem

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Photos[edit]

All of the photos here have been mis-identified. I think due to my mis-translation of מסרק. The main photo is of Ras Abu 'Ammar according to the caption given in the Palmach archive. The caption for the first photo in the gallery google translates as "back to her horse". The remaining four are of Beit Mahsir. Padres Hana (talk) 15:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The caption for the Ras Abu 'Ammar photo in the Palmach archive refers to it being opposite Beit Jala. Harel 6th Battalion volume 3 album 6/23. Which is why I think it is more authentic.Padres Hana (talk) 15:36, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The caption for the photo with the jeep doesn't mention Kasla. "back to her horse" Padres Hana (talk) 18:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery[edit]

The remaining four photos in the gallery are complete misidentifications. No explanation. Many apologies. Moving to Bayt Mahsir. Padres Hana (talk) 20:16, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kasla = Chesalon?[edit]

Ok, lets look at the sources:

Ganor, Amir; Klein, Eitan (2015-05-04). "Khirbat el-Mitraz" (127). Hadashot Arkheologiyot – Excavations and Surveys in Israel. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

This is about a cave (map ref. 20417/63218; ie here), with remnants from the Roman time, possibly from people hiding during the First Jewish–Roman War(66–73 CE) or Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–136 CE) And the article states: "Evidently, those who sought shelter in this cave were from one of the Jewish settlements close by, perhaps from the nearby settlement of Kesalon. Kesalon is mentioned in a document from Wadi Murabba‘at that dates to the first century CE, attesting to the existence of a Jewish settlement there during this period"

BUT: it does not states where Kesalon was located

The Conder 1879(!) articel discuss if Kiriath-jearim was located at Kurid el 'Anah (=Abu Ghosh)

The Israel Finkelstein et al archeological excavations; Excavations at Kiriath-jearim, 2019: Preliminary Report are also from Abu Ghosh.

So we have two facts: there are remants from the Roman era here, (in the Khirbat el-Mitraz-cave), and Kesalon/Chesalon existed at least in the same era; in the first century CE.

BUT: I fail to see any archeological evidence that Kesalon/Chesalon existed here, at Kasla? (Unlike at Abu Ghosh, where they "have shown that the site flourished in the Iron IIB-C, Hellenistic and Early Roman periods")

Hence, I think we should not mention it in the lead, when, AFAIK, there is zero archeological evidence that Biblical Kesalon/Chesalon was located here. Comments? Huldra (talk) 22:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Huldra: I see the identification in a number of better places, such as Tsafrir p103 and Abel (you have it) p299. They don't discuss sub-kilometer precision, but that's true for most localities. Zero^talk 03:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zero0000: Yes, since SWP placed it here, many have said the same. It doesn't change the fact that there have been no (AFAIK) archeological evidence for it, though.

And I think the Conder and Finkelstein refs should go; they are basically about Abu Ghosh, and they do not say that Chesalon was located here, Huldra (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]