Talk:Kdenlive

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as High-importance).

Dead Website[edit]

The official website is currently down. Is this project dead? Timbomb (talk) 00:43, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, Kdenlive just migrated to KDE infrastructure and I would guess that the website just hasn't migrated yet. --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 01:37, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

kdenlive.org is still not responding. Access forbidden. Error 403. Porthugh (talk) 21:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

kdenlive.org is back online Porthugh (talk) 05:36, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Developer takes break, project is fine[edit]

Just wanted to note that despite November's news stories about the main developer "disappearing", and the project possibly "never" seeing another release, everything is actually fine. The main developer did stop committing code, but another developer spoke to him by phone[1] and confirmed that he's well, and that he's just taking a break. Development has picked up in December due to new contributors.

This isn't really worthy of a mention in the article but I wanted to leave a comment to hopefully prevent others from writing in the article that the project was halted or dead. Gronky (talk) 02:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kdenlive for Mac OS X[edit]

I removed this page from Category:OS_X_multimedia_software, but for the time being left "Mac OS X" in the infobox description. The project makes its source code available and it can theoretically be compiled on OS X, but it offers no Mac version of the software. Any opinions on how to categorize this? ZackTheCardshark (talk) 18:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have it right, if there is no Mac package then it isn't Mac software even though someone could theoretically take the source code and compile one. - Ahunt (talk) 18:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the references to macOS from the page. ZackTheCardshark (talk) 15:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kdenlive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150321095744/https://kdenlive.org/node/9430 to https://kdenlive.org/node/9430

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photos out of date[edit]

All the photos in this article do not represent the latest version (19.08.03) This needs to change — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.78.66 (talk) 16:48, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Ahunt (talk) 17:04, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that all of the photos are still out of date. Are you using an old version of kdenlive?? TheMickyRosen-Left (talk) 19:59, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am using the current version from the Ubuntu repos for 19.10, which what that screenshot is: 19.08.2. There have been many Kdenlive releases in the last while. If you really think we need the latest release on the article page then someone will have to upload them with each release. Personally I think that a recent screenshot is good enough. We are WP:NOTCHANGELOG here, we're an encyclopedia. - Ahunt (talk) 20:45, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]